The crowded shopping malls of New York, the packed entertainment centers of London, and the intense rhythm of consumption on the streets of Paris present a striking paradox to contemporary economic observers. To an outside observer, this scene might appear to be evidence of a post-pandemic economic recovery and widespread prosperity.
However, behind the display lights and the constantly running point-of-sale (POS) terminals lies one of the deepest socio-economic crises in modern history. Rather than hidden wealth, this reality reflects a structurally dispossessed generation that is turning to “doom spending” as a collective coping mechanism.
On a global scale, this rise in doom spending suggests that the traditional capitalist social contract has severely eroded. For nearly a century, that formula was simple: enter the workforce, save regularly, acquire property, and live a secure retirement. For the Baby Boomer generation—and, to some extent, Generation X—this formula represented an attainable goal.
Today, however, for a significant portion of Millennials and Generation Z, this equation is increasingly dysfunctional. Faced with astronomical housing costs, the erosion of real wages, and systemic inflation, global youth are setting aside long-term financial plans and turning toward short-term, instant gratification.
The Mathematics of Financial Nihilism
This behavioral shift is finding its place more frequently in contemporary economic literature as “financial nihilism”—the total loss of belief that individuals will be rewarded if they abide by the long-term rules of the system. World Economic Forum analyses indicate that younger generations’ expectations regarding economic security and social mobility have weakened significantly.
In recent years, for a young person entering the workforce in many of the world’s major cities, the gap between average income levels and housing prices is not just a difficult obstacle to overcome. It is turning into a goal that appears increasingly unattainable. In many developed economies, high interest rates, tightening credit conditions, and rapidly rising housing prices are turning homeownership—rather than being a deferred plan—into an increasingly distant possibility for many young people.
This structural despair has also been documented by research. Joint studies by researchers at the University of Chicago and Northwestern University demonstrate a strong link between individual perceptions regarding the probability of homeownership and their motivation to save. When the ultimate goal becomes completely unattainable, the daily sacrifices endured for years to reach that goal lose their rational foundation. As a result, capital that should under normal conditions be set aside for a housing down payment is directed straight into daily consumption.
From Macroeconomics to Micro-Luxuries
The statistical footprints of this psychological transformation can be clearly tracked on a global scale. Intuit Credit Karma research reveals that 41 percent of Generation Z in the United States admits to engaging in “doom spending” to alleviate macroeconomic anxiety and future stress. Consumption is no longer about meeting a periodic material need. Rather, it has become a societal tool to suppress acute anxiety about the future.
Similarly, long-term consumer trend reports from financial institutions like Barclays confirm a sharp shift toward experience-oriented consumption instead of asset acquisition (such as housing or cars). Spending on travel, dining out, and instant socialization is growing much faster than traditional retail categories.
More than a century ago, economist Thorstein Veblen introduced the theory of “conspicuous consumption,” arguing that people use purchases to demonstrate their social status to others. In the classical era, this status was displayed through macro-assets such as land, permanent real estate, or luxury automobiles.
In today’s world, which is built upon the “sign value” of objects as defined in Jean Baudrillard’s “consumer society” theory, social status is no longer constructed through macro-assets, but through “micro-luxuries” that are easier to access. Youth can no longer purchase a home. However, they can acquire socio-cultural prestige by buying a premium smartphone. Middle- and lower-class youth, who have been structurally pushed outside the system, can use this method to feel identity and belonging.
From Micro-Luxuries to Instant Consumption
This transformation is reshaping not only consumer behavior but also corporate marketing strategies. For decades, consumer economies relied on planned obsolescence—the deliberate shortening of product lifespans to encourage repeat purchases. Today, however, one of the most significant shifts is taking place not in the products themselves, but in the way consumption is financed.
One of the clearest examples is the rapid expansion of Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) services. According to a 2025 survey , consumers from Generations Y and Z are now the most active users of BNPL services, with nearly half reporting that they used BNPL in the past year.
The growth of the BNPL market has been equally striking. According to the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau , the number of BNPL loans issued by the five largest providers grew by 970 percent between 2019 and 2021, increasing from 16.8 million to 180 million loans. Together, these trends suggest that consumer finance platforms and retailers are increasingly monetizing the demand for immediate gratification—a behavioral shift that closely mirrors the broader rise of doom spending.
A similar transformation can be observed in corporate communications. According to GlobeScan , the share of consumers who recall seeing sustainability messaging from brands declined from 49 percent in 2023 to 36 percent in 2025, while public trust in corporate sustainability claims also fell significantly. Although this shift cannot be attributed to a single factor, it coincides with weakening long-term expectations and a marketing landscape that is increasingly focused on immediate needs and short-term gratification rather than distant promises.
The Cost of Losing Faith in the Future
This consumer craze, which mainstream economic critics frequently label as spoiled, financially illiterate, and luxury-seeking, is in reality an extremely tragic and rational response to institutional and systemic failure.
If young generations believe that saving, education, and regular work will not pay off in the long run, the problem is not merely individual consumption habits. This loss of faith can transform into a broader crisis of legitimacy extending from productivity to political participation, and from institutional trust to social mobility.
It also suggests that all the current pessimism around attempts to reduce carbon emissions, protect biodiversity, and reshape economies around goals of sustainability is have a profound impact on consumer choices. It gives new meaning to the expression “shop ‘til you drop.”
The post The Rise of Doom Spending appeared first on Foreign Policy In Focus .