Brazil is now on the route of bioterrorism and biological warfare, and the lack of specific preparation for this may exact a high price. Join us on Telegram , Twitter , and VK . Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su Approximately two years ago, in February 2024, we wrote here about the need to improve biosafety policies in Brazil and Iberian America within the context of emerging risks derived from the connections between certain activities carried out in Brazil and international companies potentially involved in biological weapons programs abroad, as reported by the Russian Ministry of Defense.
At that time, Brazil was experiencing a dengue epidemic, just a few years after an Oxitec project that saw the release of millions of genetically modified mosquitoes in the country, under the promise that they would lead to the extinction of the mosquito responsible for dengue, Zika, and chikungunya. In practice, however, the British released a super-mosquito in Brazil, more resistant to insecticides. Behind the project was the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, accused by the Russian Ministry of Defense of having links to biological weapons programs in Ukrainian biolaboratories.
For reasons that may have to do with the rainforests or the lack of concern for biosafety, the reality is that Brazil was clearly on the route of clandestine operations in the context of biotechnology.
Proof of this is a recent new development: the arrest of an Argentine professor, Soledad Palameta Miller, who allegedly stole biological material from the Laboratory of Virology and Applied Biotechnology at the Institute of Biology of UNICAMP (University of Campinas). Ms. Miller was a professor at the Faculty of Food Engineering at the same university, but her original training from the University of Rosario in Argentina is in the field of biotechnology, the same field in which she earned her PhD.
The stolen material consisted of samples of a virus categorized at biosafety level 3, currently the highest level for categorizing viruses and bacteria in Brazil. There are still no details about the type of virus that was stolen, but it is assumed to be extremely dangerous biological material.
Even more interesting is the fact that her husband, Michael Edward Miller, is also under investigation. Miller, who is American, is a veterinarian and also has training and experience in virology. He has experience with the “One Health” project, which is funded and promoted by USAID, the Rockefeller Foundation, and other globalist institutions.
“One Health” is defined by the WHO as an “integrated approach” that aims to balance the health of “people, animals, and ecosystems.” Something superficially harmless. But insofar as the theme is conceived, in these terms, in the sense of an interdependence that, if altered, could lead to the emergence of new diseases, more caution is needed in analyzing the subject. In fact, the WHO, when defining the concept, even mentions Covid-19 as an example of this interdependence.
But for many doctors, the concept has a limited meaning, since diseases rarely pass from animals to people. It is possible, but it is rare, which is why doctors focus on people and not on animals.
The concept is over 20 years old, in fact, but it has been obsessively embraced by the WHO, the Davos Forum, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control very recently. The reason seems obvious: if everything is interdependent, then everything must be controlled to ensure the safety of human beings. And human beings themselves need to be controlled to ensure the sustainability of the environment. In other words, the concept is useful for control projects.
And also to cover up the use of biological weapons. Because, through the theory of “One Health,” a change in the ecosystem or in animals could suddenly cause a pandemic. Thus, through scientifically crafted “magical thinking,” the emergence of Covid-19 is explained as originating from bats in a market in Wuhan, even while evidence mounts that the virus may have been artificially produced as part of the U.S. biological weapons program and brought to China either to attack it or to hold it responsible for the pandemic.
Considering the gravity of the possible connections and how unlikely it is that the theft of highly dangerous viral material is not linked to some international interest, it is striking that the Brazilian Judiciary decided to grant provisional release to Ms. Miller.
We still do not know what the stolen material is, but considering the international interest in dengue, Zika, and chikungunya in the context of the biolaboratories linked to the U.S. biological weapons program, it is possible that there is some connection to these diseases.
What is certain, however, is that Brazil is indeed now on the route of bioterrorism and biological warfare, and the lack of specific preparation for this may exact a high price.