The 2026 FIFA World Cup has begun on American soil, the first time the United States has hosted the tournament in 32 years. When it concludes, the country will begin preparing for the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles. In exchange for the privilege of hosting the world’s two largest sporting events, and the enormous revenue they generate, a host nation should ease its visa policy to the fullest extent consistent with ordinary security interests.
Previous World Cup host nations made this the norm. South Africa in 2010 created a dedicated events visa and waived normal fees entirely for ticket holders. Brazil in 2014 created a fee-waived visa category tied directly to match tickets. Russia in 2018 lifted visa requirements entirely for Fan ID holders. For the last World Cup, Qatar in 2022 created a universal entry document for all fans and loosened its terms further mid-tournament.
Conversely, the United States has adopted the widest nationality-based exclusion policy since the Chinese Exclusion Act.
Nationals from 39 countries currently face U.S. entry restrictions , ranging from partial limitations to outright bans. Among those 39 are four countries whose national teams qualified for the tournament. Haiti and Iran face complete entry bans; Ivory Coast and Senegal face partial restrictions. Although players are exempt from the presidential ban, fans have no pathway to acquire tourist visas to support their teams, player families cannot watch their loved ones play in the biggest soccer event in the world, and home-country media cannot obtain visas to cover the games stateside. The United States has adopted the widest nationality-based exclusion policy since the Chinese Exclusion Act. At the same time, the United States created a system called FIFA PASS, which gives World Cup ticket holders the opportunity to schedule a prioritized consular interview to enter the country. So, while some are fully banned, those who are not can expedite their visa appointment. This pattern recurs throughout this administration’s approach: Those fully excluded receive nothing, while those who are not excluded receive an expedited benefit unavailable to the general public.
One might wonder how these bans are allowed in the first place. The legal vehicle is Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a provision historically invoked with restraint and for targeted purposes. Before Donald Trump , presidents used it for specific suspensions tied to specific conduct: Haitians intercepted at sea under Ronald Reagan , maritime interdiction extended under George W. Bush , senior Haitian government officials (affiliated with the 1994 coup) under Bill Clinton , and individuals responsible for grave human rights abuses by the Iranian and Syrian governments under Barack Obama . Despite leading a country built by immigrants, Trump has used the same authority to ban ordinary people from large portions of the world. This is unlike anything seen among the other countries of the so-called Five Eyes intelligence alliance — Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.
Although nationality-based exclusion has historical precedent, the current bans appear to function as instruments of punishment rather than legitimate security measures. The justification typically rests on elevated visa overstay rates or insufficient governmental cooperation, meaning that individual nationals are effectively penalized for the conduct of others. This year’s World Cup will reflect that reality in diminished diversity, and the consequences extend beyond mere attendance. Trump has also barred the Iranian national team from sleeping on American soil, requiring the players to overnight in Tijuana, Mexico, and cross the border only to compete.
No story captures this more sharply than that of Omar Artan . Named Africa’s best male soccer referee in 2025 and selected by FIFA to work the tournament, Artan was set to become the first Somali referee ever to officiate at a World Cup. He cleared the visa process, boarded his flight and landed in Miami, where U.S. Customs and Border Protection denied him entry over unspecified “vetting concerns.” FIFA removed him from the tournament. He returned home to a hero’s welcome in Mogadishu, received by thousands at the city’s main stadium and by Somalia’s prime minister, who wrote that Artan had “already won the hearts of millions.”
As in the first Trump administration, serious questions remain about whether these bans serve any genuine security purpose. Instead, they appear to function as diplomatic punishment aimed at governments this administration dislikes. Preventing fans and players from freely entering the United States, and forcing them to bear the personal cost of policies directed at their governments, produces no discernible security benefit. What it does produce is a steady stream of international criticism. In the opening days of a World Cup the United States is hosting, Omar Artan’s story is the image America has projected to the world.
The post The World Cup Has Always Welcomed the World. Not This Time. appeared first on Truthdig .